Questions on 4.1.4 The Transcendental Critique of Religion

Here Sangharakshita explores a key idea in Buddhist history – that religion is only a means to an end, not an end in itself. It is based on chapters 3 and 4 of the Vimalakīrti Nirdeśa so try tomake time to read them during the week.Questions for reflection and discussion

  1. “Once our basic needs for food, clothing, shelter and leisure have been met, what do we need more
    than anything else in life? … Surely it is freedom” (page 66).
    Do you agree with this answer? What other possible answers can you think of?
  2. What are the consequences of religion becoming an end in itself?
  3. How can religion enslave us? How can we make sure it doesn’t? What is the transcendental
    critique of religion?
  4. “The rule of thumb is to upset people as little as possible, while still saying what you feel must be
    said” (page 71).
    Do you agree with this? If not, how do you think criticism should be dealt with in the Sangha?
  5. What might an encounter with Vimalakīrti represent in the context of your own spiritual life?
  6. On page 75, Sangharakshita outlines four things that can help us deal with our unskilful
    behaviour (alongside reviving our original inspiration):
    a. Try to understand what you have done.
    b. Cultivate a sense of regret.
    c. Resolve not to do that particular thing again.
    d. Take steps to ensure that in future you do what is right.
    Can you make use of these in your own life?
  7. Which is the greater danger in your own spiritual life – making Buddhism an end in itself or
    abandoning the raft (of the Dharma) too soon?
  8. Do you have the conditions you need in your life to become free? Does Triratna offer
    conditions to help you become free?